Forum Home Forum Home > Rugby Competitions > Super Rugby
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Schalk Brits suspended for 4 weeks
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


The Lions next play the Sharks in Durban in the Currie Cup on 5 July 2024, kickoff is at 17:15

Schalk Brits suspended for 4 weeks

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Transvaal View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 30-Mar-2016
Status: Offline
Points: 39331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Transvaal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Schalk Brits suspended for 4 weeks
    Posted: 02-Apr-2019 at 11:13am

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE HEARING NEWS RELEASE

Hearing Details (date, time and venue): Tuesday 2 April 2019 8am(SAST), 5pm(AEDT), 7pm(NZDT) via video-conference
Judicial Committee Chairperson: Helen Morgan
Judicial Committee Members: David Croft and Lawrence Sephaka
Player: Schalk Brits
Team: Bulls
Position: Hooker
Date of Incident: 30 March 2019
Nature of Offence: Law 9.12: A player must not physically abuse anyone. Physical abuse includes, but is not limited to punching or striking with the hand or arm.
Elapsed time in match when incident occurred: 58min

SANZAAR NEWS RELEASE

Schalk Brits suspended for 4 weeks

A SANZAAR Judicial Committee Hearing has found Schalk Brits of the Bulls guilty of contravening Law 9.12: A player must not physically abuse anyone after he was issued with a Red Card during a Super Rugby match at the weekend.

Brits has been suspended for 4 weeks, up to an including 4 May 2019. This suspension covers the period of the Player's next 4 Super Rugby matches.

The incident occurred in the 58th minute of the match between the Sharks and Bulls played at Johnson Kings Park in Durban on 30 March 2019.

The SANZAAR Judicial Hearing held via video conference on Tuesday 2 April 2019 8am(SAST), 5pm(AEDT), 7pm(NZDT) was heard by Helen Morgan, David Croft and Lawrence Sephaka.

In her finding, the Judicial Committee Chairperson Helen Morgan ruled the following: 

"Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence, including from the player and submissions from his legal representative, Gert van der Merwe, the Judicial Committee upheld the Red Card under Law 9.12." 
 
""With respect to sanction the Judicial Committee deemed the act of foul play merited a mid-range entry point of 6 weeks due to the World Rugby instructions that dictate any incident of foul play involving contact with the head must start at a mid-range level. The evidence demonstrated the Player contacted the opposing Player's head with more than one punch. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the Player's demonstrated remorse, extensive experience, the fact the Player’s actions were in self-defence and the Player has pleaded guilty at the first available opportunity, the Judicial Committee reduced the suspension by 2 weeks.  The Judicial Committee was conscious of the fact that the Player was not the instigator of the incident, but due to the Player's previous two periods of suspension for striking offences, the Judicial Committee were unable to provide the full 50% discount for the sanction. This leads to a sanction of 4 weeks."

"The player is therefore suspended from all forms of the game for 4 weeks, up to and including 4 May 2019.”
Back to Top
Transvaal View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 30-Mar-2016
Status: Offline
Points: 39331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Transvaal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Apr-2019 at 11:16am
>>but due to the Player's previous two periods of suspension for striking offences, the Judicial Committee were unable to provide the full 50% discount for the sanction. This leads to a sanction of 4 weeks.

Presies wat ek gese het, so volgens sy dissiplinere rekord was hy al reeds 2 keer vantevore vir slaan geskors, so dis sy 3rde keer en is sy straf swaarder as die van Akker, al is dit nou net 1 week langer
Back to Top
WitBoer View Drop Down
Koning Leeu
Koning Leeu
Avatar

Joined: 31-Mar-2016
Location: Bronkhorstsprui
Status: Offline
Points: 2162
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote WitBoer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Apr-2019 at 12:20pm
Originally posted by Transvaal Transvaal wrote:

>>but due to the Player's previous two periods of suspension for striking offences, the Judicial Committee were unable to provide the full 50% discount for the sanction. This leads to a sanction of 4 weeks.

Presies wat ek gese het, so volgens sy dissiplinere rekord was hy al reeds 2 keer vantevore vir slaan geskors, so dis sy 3rde keer en is sy straf swaarder as die van Akker, al is dit nou net 1 week langer
Hy is eintlik vir 5 weke geskors... 4 Wedstryde... Akker is geskors tot en met 19 April en hy is tot en met 4 Mei... 
"Believe nothing, No matter where you read it, Or who has said it, Not even if I have said it, Unless it agrees with your own reason And your own common sense" - Buddha
Back to Top
Red_Machine View Drop Down
Ervare Leeu
Ervare Leeu
Avatar

Joined: 14-Mar-2018
Location: Vanderbijlpark
Status: Offline
Points: 566
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Red_Machine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Apr-2019 at 12:48pm
its ludicrous that Akker gets a lighter sentence. It's even more ridiculous that the Blues wing Tele'a also gets a 4 week ban for his timing issue in the Lleyds challenge.
Back to Top
PaBz0r View Drop Down
Koning Leeu
Koning Leeu


Joined: 30-Mar-2016
Location: Pretoria
Status: Offline
Points: 2728
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PaBz0r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Apr-2019 at 12:56pm
Originally posted by Red_Machine Red_Machine wrote:

It's even more ridiculous that the Blues wing Tele'a also gets a 4 week ban for his timing issue in the Lleyds challenge.

It is a joke, Lleyds decided to jump when the attacking player was already within close proximity. He put himself at risk by doing that and should bare the coincidences of that action. Just protecting the jumper is BS in such a situation, the guy that jumps must also make a call if it is safe to jump or not.


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.